You are here

Home > Practice Area Library > Disability Benefits > First Circuit > Civil procedure

Civil procedure

Enter the word(s) you are searching for; use quotes for exact phrase
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

Caterino, Et. Al V. Barry

01/01/1990 - lock_open
Explains the requirements for intervention as of right.

In Re Bushkin Associates

01/01/1989 - lock_open
To obtain a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show some special risk of irreparable harm and clear entitlement to the relief requested.

U.S. V. Comley

01/01/1989 - lock_open
The district court must enforce an administrative agency subpoena if it is issued according to statutory procedures, for a purpose... Read more

Torres V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1988 - lock_open
A dismissal of a hearing request on res judicata grounds, where the current claim has the same factual basis as the earlier decision, is... Read more

McCuin V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1987 - lock_open
Own motion reopening by Appeals Council limited to 60 days; reopening after 60 days allowed only on the motion of claimants. Court gives... Read more

Crosby V. SSA

01/01/1986 - lock_open
"It would be an unwarranted judicial intrusion into this pervasively regulated area for federal courts to issue injunctions imposing... Read more

Avery V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1985 - lock_open
Generally, a remand order is an interlocutory order that does not divest a court of jurisdiction over a case. Absent a clear statement to... Read more
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

Caterino, Et. Al V. Barry

01/01/1990 - lock_open
Explains the requirements for intervention as of right.

In Re Bushkin Associates

01/01/1989 - lock_open
To obtain a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show some special risk of irreparable harm and clear entitlement to the relief requested.

U.S. V. Comley

01/01/1989 - lock_open
The district court must enforce an administrative agency subpoena if it is issued according to statutory procedures, for a purpose... Read more

Torres V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1988 - lock_open
A dismissal of a hearing request on res judicata grounds, where the current claim has the same factual basis as the earlier decision, is... Read more

McCuin V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1987 - lock_open
Own motion reopening by Appeals Council limited to 60 days; reopening after 60 days allowed only on the motion of claimants. Court gives... Read more

Crosby V. SSA

01/01/1986 - lock_open
"It would be an unwarranted judicial intrusion into this pervasively regulated area for federal courts to issue injunctions imposing... Read more

Avery V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1985 - lock_open
Generally, a remand order is an interlocutory order that does not divest a court of jurisdiction over a case. Absent a clear statement to... Read more