You are here

In the Matter of SAV, FH# 2018-0010

Date: 
06/20/2018
Author: 
Jorge F. Ferreira
lock_open

Affirmed - An appealed case closure remained closed when (1) there had been multiple unsupported or screened out 51B decisions; (2) the appellant was not the primary custodian of the child; (3) the parents had refused DCF services; and (4) the appeal involved arguments based on family dynamics that had previously been handled in probate court.

To save files, right click and choose 'Save Target As' or 'Save Link As'
AttachmentSize
PDF icon 20180010.pdf651.4 KB
Library Categories: