The Online Resource for Massachusetts Poverty Law Advocates

In the Matter of SAV, FH# 2018-0010

Jorge F. Ferreira

Affirmed - An appealed case closure remained closed when (1) there had been multiple unsupported or screened out 51B decisions; (2) the appellant was not the primary custodian of the child; (3) the parents had refused DCF services; and (4) the appeal involved arguments based on family dynamics that had previously been handled in probate court.

To save files, right click and choose 'Save Target As' or 'Save Link As'
File Attachment: 
PDF icon 20180010.pdf651.4 KB

Limit Offer