In the Matter of SAV, FH# 2018-0010
Date:
Affirmed - An appealed case closure remained closed when (1) there had been multiple unsupported or screened out 51B decisions; (2) the appellant was not the primary custodian of the child; (3) the parents had refused DCF services; and (4) the appeal involved arguments based on family dynamics that had previously been handled in probate court.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
20180010.pdf (651.4 KB) | 651.4 KB |