In the Matter of SAV, FH# 2018-0010

Date:
Author:
Jorge F. Ferreira
Affirmed - An appealed case closure remained closed when (1) there had been multiple unsupported or screened out 51B decisions; (2) the appellant was not the primary custodian of the child; (3) the parents had refused DCF services; and (4) the appeal involved arguments based on family dynamics that had previously been handled in probate court.
Attachment Size
20180010.pdf (651.4 KB) 651.4 KB