You are here

Home

IQ

PAULA TARTARINI vs. DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION

07/23/2012
J. Sullivan

 

A Mass Appeals Court decision expands the DDS eligibility criteria for adults.  

 

MA Appeals Court

DDS Eligibility Decision by H.O. Hudgins 2010-35

01/01/2010
Hudgins

 

DDS Eligibility Decision by H.O. Marcia Hudgins 2010 -35

Outcome: ineligible

Keyword: high IQ

DDS Eligibility Decision by H.O. Adamo 2010-26

01/01/2010
Jeanne Adamo

Outcome: Ineligible

Keyword: IQ; domicile

Hearing Officer: Jeanne Adamo

Counsel present for Appellant: No

DMR Eligibility Decision by H.O. Marcia Hudgins 11/09/06

11/09/2006
Marcia Hudgins, Esq.

Outcome: Ineligible

Keyword: IQ, IQ testing after age 18

Hearing Officer: Marcia Hudgins

DMR Eligibility Decison by H.O. Hudgins 10 19 06

10/19/2006
Hudgins

Outcome: Ineligible

Keyword: autism, IQ, trauma, depressed scores

Hearing Officer: Marcia A. Hudgins

DMR Eligibility Decision by H.O. Rosenberg 8 30 07

08/30/2007
Rosenberg

Outcome: Ineligible
Keyword: IQ, lack of evidence

DMR Eligibility Decision by H.O. Rosenberg 6 23 07

06/23/2007
Rosenberg

Outcome: Ineligible
Keyword: IQ, age at time of examination, testing behavior, performance scores depressed

DMR Eligibility Decison by H.O. Rosenberg 5 20 07

05/20/2007
Rosenberg

Outcome: Ineligible
Keyword: IQ

DMR Eligibility Decision by H.O. Rosenberg 4 23 07

04/23/2007
Rosenberg

Outcome: Ineligible
Keyword: IQ, academic abilities

DMR Eligibility Decison by H.O. Rosenberg 4 1 07

04/01/2007
Rosenberg

Outcome: Ineligible
Keyword: IQ, ADHD, underestimate

Subscribe to RSS - IQ