You are here

Home > Practice Area Library > Disability Benefits > First Circuit > Dependents benefits Title II

Dependents benefits Title II

Enter the word(s) you are searching for; use quotes for exact phrase
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

Parisi V. Chater

01/01/1995 - lock_open
In calculating benefits of dependent child of disabled worker , family maximum cap does not reduce child's benefits by amount of spousal... Read more

Cassas V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1990 - lock_open
Regulations provide that in order to receive widow(er)s benefits, impairments must meet or equal a listing, and that age, education and... Read more

Becker V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1990 - lock_open
State intestacy laws determine paternity for Social Security purposes.

Slessinger V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1987 - lock_open
State, not federal law of divorce governs validity of claim. Even in the presence of substantial evidence, the Court may review conclusions... Read more

Rose v. Sec

09/22/1986 - McNaught, D.J. - lock_open
Transportation to Work. At Step 4, test is whether claimant has ability to return to past relevant work performed at substantial gainful... Read more

Garcia V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1985 - lock_open
Unmarried 2nd wife is not entitled to benefits as a "deemed" widow where wage earner did not divorce his first wife.

Ayuso-Morales V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1982 - lock_open
Widow did not qualify for widow's Social Security benefits where she cohabitated for 20-years with her future husband in jurisdiction not... Read more

Rodriguez V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Court must uphold the Secretary's findings if a reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence in the record as a whole, could accept it as... Read more

Mendoza V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Failure of putative father to claim paternity directly in the two weeks available to him prior to his death from lung cancer is not proof... Read more

Rodriquez V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Court consider the medical opinion given by one or more physicians designated by the Secretary in deciding medical equivalence. Disability... Read more
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

Parisi V. Chater

01/01/1995 - lock_open
In calculating benefits of dependent child of disabled worker , family maximum cap does not reduce child's benefits by amount of spousal... Read more

Cassas V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1990 - lock_open
Regulations provide that in order to receive widow(er)s benefits, impairments must meet or equal a listing, and that age, education and... Read more

Becker V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1990 - lock_open
State intestacy laws determine paternity for Social Security purposes.

Slessinger V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1987 - lock_open
State, not federal law of divorce governs validity of claim. Even in the presence of substantial evidence, the Court may review conclusions... Read more

Rose v. Sec

09/22/1986 - McNaught, D.J. - lock_open
Transportation to Work. At Step 4, test is whether claimant has ability to return to past relevant work performed at substantial gainful... Read more

Garcia V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1985 - lock_open
Unmarried 2nd wife is not entitled to benefits as a "deemed" widow where wage earner did not divorce his first wife.

Ayuso-Morales V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1982 - lock_open
Widow did not qualify for widow's Social Security benefits where she cohabitated for 20-years with her future husband in jurisdiction not... Read more

Rodriquez V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Court consider the medical opinion given by one or more physicians designated by the Secretary in deciding medical equivalence. Disability... Read more

Rodriguez V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Court must uphold the Secretary's findings if a reasonable mind, reviewing the evidence in the record as a whole, could accept it as... Read more

Mendoza V. Sec'y HHS

01/01/1981 - lock_open
Failure of putative father to claim paternity directly in the two weeks available to him prior to his death from lung cancer is not proof... Read more