Department sought to recoup $2668 in aid pending TAFDC benefits. Department also denied her food stamps application because of excessive assets. Appellant had lost an earlier hearing, where she argued that the money in the bank account was a non-countable asset. Subsequent to losing that appeal, appellant had made an ADA Reasonable Accommodation Request contending that the bank account should not be countable. Hearing officer found that he could not revisit the first decision, therefore there was an overpayment of aid paid while the hearing was pending. As for the ADA Reasonable Accommodation request, since the denial of this request occurred after the Department had denied food stamps, the ADA denial needed to be appealed separately. The hearing officer upheld the food stamps denial pending the resolution of the ADA claim -- if that claim is approved on appeal, then food stamp eligibility can be redetermined.