The Online Resource for Massachusetts Poverty Law Advocates

Feed aggregator

Republican Governors’ Plan Would Threaten Medicaid Coverage for Tens of Millions – But Also Highlights Vast Differences with Congressional Republicans

A number of Republican governors are crafting, but haven’t yet agreed on, a health plan that would cap federal funding for Medicaid, leaked documents show.

Categories: Benefits, Poverty

In Case You Missed It…

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 4:23pm

This week at CBPP, we focused on health care, the federal budget, state budgets and taxes, and family income support.

Categories: Benefits, Poverty

Not Just Nausea And Vomiting: Cancer Docs Now Worry About 'Financial Toxicity'

CommonHealth (WBUR) - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 2:02pm
A new study reveals that nearly one in three non-elderly cancer patients are not taking their prescribed drug regimens because they can’t afford it.
Categories: Health Care

Federal Grants to States and Localities at Risk

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 11:31am

Federal grants to state and local governments help fund a number of critical programs and services on which residents rely. But they’re already at historically low levels as a share of the economy, and proposals from President Trump and congressional Republicans would shrink them further — potentially diminishing or eliminating the programs they support.

Federal grants provide roughly 31 percent of state budgets and 22 percent of state and local budgets combined. They fall into two broad categories:

Categories: Benefits, Poverty

States Shouldn’t Wait to Invest in Infrastructure

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 11:20am

States are awaiting details of a promised federal plan to invest more in roads, bridges, and other public infrastructure. More federal help would be welcome, but states would be wise to move ahead on their own.

Categories: Benefits, Poverty

The Impeachment Trial of President Andrew Johnson

In Custodia Legis - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 8:58am

Andrew Johnson. Painting by Bingham & Dodd (1866). Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pga.04416

On this day in 1868, the House of Representatives voted to adopt a resolution that became eleven articles of impeachment against President Andrew Johnson after he dismissed Secretary of War Edwin Stanton without the approval of the Senate in violation of the Tenure of Office Act. Johnson had attempted to remove Stanton on two occasions. He suspended Stanton during a Senate recess and then dismissed him after the Senate rejected the initial suspension. The removal of Stanton was Johnson’s latest action in his battle against the implementation of congressionally favored reconstruction policies in the South. Johnson was narrowly acquitted on articles eleven, two, and three by one vote in the Senate. At that point, the Senate adjourned the trial without considering the rest of the articles.

The judgment of history has not been kind to President Johnson’s policy preferences on reconstruction, which included a limited view of the rights of former slaves and favored the lax treatment of former Confederate officials. However, Johnson’s claim that the Tenure of Office Act was unconstitutional was vindicated by the Supreme Court of the United States fifty-one years after his death in Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). In Myers the Court held that the president has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials and does not require the consent of the Senate, although that ruling has been limited in scope by subsequent decisions.

You can explore the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson on the Library of Congress site Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation.

Categories: Research & Litigation

First Edition: February 24, 2017

Kaiser Health News - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 6:33am
Categories: Health Care

Support For Health Law Grows, Leaving Republicans In A Bind

Kaiser Health News - Fri, 02/24/2017 - 5:00am

Republican members of Congress are at home this week, with many of them getting an earful from anxious constituents about their plans to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act. A poll out Friday gives those lawmakers something to be anxious about, too.

The monthly tracking poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation finds overall support for the health law ticked up to 48 percent in February, the highest point since shortly after it passed in 2010. That was a 5-point increase since the last poll in December. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent project of the foundation.)

In addition, 6 in 10 people said they did not favor current GOP proposals for turning control of Medicaid, the federal-state program for low-income residents, over to the states or changing the federal funding method. More than half said Medicaid is important to them or family members.

The increase in the law’s popularity is almost entirely due to a spike in support among independents, whose approval of the law has risen to 50 percent, compared with 39 percent unfavorable. Continuing a trend that dates to the passage of the law, the vast majority of Democrats approve of it (73 percent), while the vast majority of Republicans disapprove (74 percent).

Poll respondents are also concerned about the way Republicans say they will overhaul the measure. While they are almost evenly divided between wanting to see the law repealed (47 percent) or not repealed (48 percent), very few (18 percent) of those favoring repeal support the idea of working out replacement details later. More than half of the repeal supporters (28 percent of the sample) say the repeal and the ACA’s replacement should come simultaneously.

Interestingly, even among Republicans, fewer than a third (31 percent) favor an immediate repeal, while 48 percent support simultaneous repeal and replacement, and 16 percent don’t want the law repealed at all.

Use Our Content This KHN story can be republished for free (details).

Simultaneous repeal and replacement, which is what President Donald Trump has promised, could prove difficult since Republicans have not agreed to a plan. They are using a special budget procedure, called reconciliation, that allows them to move legislation with only a simple majority in the Senate, but that bill is limited in what it can remove from the law and what can be added to it. Other bills would likely have to overcome a filibuster by Democrats in the Senate, which requires 60 votes. Republicans currently have a 52-48 majority in that chamber.

When asked about the Republican plans to overhaul the Medicaid program, nearly two-thirds of those polled prefer the current Medicaid program to either a “block grant” that gives states more flexibility but would limit Medicaid’s currently unlimited budget, or a “per capita cap,” which would also limit spending to states but would allow federal funding to rise with enrollment increases.

Respondents also strongly favor letting states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act continue to receive federal funding. The Supreme Court in 2012 made that expansion optional; 31 states (plus Washington, D.C.) adopted it. Eighty-four percent said letting the federal funds continue was very or somewhat important, including 69 percent of Republicans, and 80 percent of respondents in states that did not expand the program.

Republicans are counting on savings from capping Medicaid to pay for other health care options they are advocating.

The national telephone poll was conducted Feb. 13-19 with a sample of 1,160 adults. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the full sample.

Categories: Health Care

Pages

Subscribe to Mass Legal Services aggregator

Limit Offer